79
978
you
convidend satisfactory,
It is to say the least; in His- Excellency's opinion most improbable that you should have been warned to attend in bout and that you should have prepared youvely to answer questions in Court, do you having dowe, without Muswing wolest
¢L+4{#
adunit
were
་
was the case in which you required to appear. But admitting thist
you
were in
quorance
when you
underbark the translations in question and prepared yourself to give evidence, that such translations and evidence
A
ivere required for a criminal treal, it is
fact that cannot be disputed theat
when
you attended in bourt at thre
trial
trial
you
became aware
51
that you had been employed on behalf of prisoiuers who were being prosecuted at the Cricecinst Peasions and yet ajou com past subsequently, received payment of the for each translations and appearance
in Court.
"
a
The Administrator is queller ~ informed thist rohen attending the Count at the trial, you took part in the m proceeding by reportedly making suggestions to the Council for the parisioners on colore behalf the fee paid, and that no communication referring thereto was made to the Crown Solicitor.
was
I am farther directed to inform
you
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.